Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Law Students Blogs -> Law and Letters
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Law Students
: Law and LettersSociology Run Amok's Template for an Academic Manuscript
Wicked Anomie (Sociology Run Amok) has posted a most useful template for an academic manuscript--it's more geared towards quantitative work, but a few modifications would make it just as good for a qualitative study:
My study is about this. Here is why this problem is important. Here is what we know about this problem. These studies leave THIS IMPORTANT THING that needs to be found out. Here is what I will did find that out. I did the study this way. It produced these results.
1. My study was motivated by this problem, question, or theory
2. Here is why this problem, question, or theory is important
3. Here is what we know about the problem, question, or theory
4. These studies leave THIS IMPORTANT THING that needs to be found out
1. My study is about this
2. Here is what I did to find out the IMPORTANT THING that nobody's looked at yet
3. I did the study this way
4. It produced these results
Literature Review (~8 pages)
Option 1: Driven by a Theory
The theory (3 pages)
1. This is the theory I am interested in
2. This is the basis for the theory
3. Here are some people who've created/ contributed to the theory
4. This theory suggests these processes
The problem (3 pages)
1. This theory has been used to examine this problem
2. Here is how that connection is made
3. Here are some people who have made that connection already
4. This is what these people HAVEN'T sufficiently addressed
My unique contribution (3 pages)
1. Theory suggests this will happen.
2. Since this, this, and this have happened, I think there is evidence to support that
3. Here are my hypotheses
Literature Review (~8 pages)
Option 2: Competing Theories
The problem (3 pages)
1. This is the problem
2. Here are some people who have studied it
3. These are the ways in which their findings are contradictory
The first theory (2 pages)
1. This theory can be applied to the problem
2. It would explain the findings in these studies
3. However, it does not explain this
The second theory (2 pages)
1. This theory can be applied to the problem, too
2. It would explain the findings in these studies
3. However, it does not explain this
The synthesis (2 page)
1a. Combined, these theories explain more than they do alone
1b. These theories predict two completely different outcomes
2. Here's why
3. My research will examine both of these theories by doing this
4. Here are my hypotheses
Methods (~2 pages)
1. I am using this dataset
2a. I collected it myself using this procedure
2b. It was collected by these people at this time
3. The people in the study have these characteristics (number, age, demographic, time, etc)
The Measures
1. My independent variables are measured using these items
2. I am justified in using these items for this reason
3. My dependent variables are measured using these items
4. I am justified in using these items for this reason
5. I am controlling for these things
6. I am justified in controlling for these things for this reason
Procedure
1. I am using this analysis/ these analyses
2. This is a good analysis/analyses to use for this reason
3. I used this stats package, made these changes, etc (for less common procedures)
Results (~8 pages)
My Study Has Integrity
Discussion/Conclusion (~5 pages)
A brief review for those who skipped the Results section
1. Here's a brief paragraph explaining what I found
2. Here is how my findings inform the paper's central problem/question/theory
Limitations
1. Here's what limitations are SPECIFIC TO MY STUDY
2. These limitations might have affected the study in this way
Future Research
1. Perhaps someone in the future can address these limitations in their own study
2. My findings raised these questions
But remember,my study also answered these questions
1. And it is important for this reason.
2. The take-home point is this. "
Thank you, Wicked Anomie!!!
Full post as published by Law and Letters on March 06, 2008 (boomark / email).

Do Not Read While Drinking Coffee
Empirical Study of Employment Discrimination Litigation
Science manuscripts submitted to journals to be checked for plagiarism
Kansas WIns NCAA Basketball Tournament, Tenures Sociology Professor
Template Discovery: Trap Among Less Reputable Divorce Attorneys
Law, Psychology & Morality - Abstract








