ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> Susan Crawford Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Intellectual Property Law

: Susan Crawford Blog

American exception: telecommunications policy

By Susan Crawford

ADVERTISEMENTS

During 2007-2008, The New York Times ran a terrific series of articles by Adam Liptak about legal stances that the US takes alone:  convicting juveniles as adults and sentencing them to life, making accomplices as liable as the killer for murders committed during felonies, allowing bail bondsmen to do business, having less than 5 percent of the world?s population but almost a quarter of its prisoners, electing judges, hiring partisan expert witnesses..

Today’s release of the Berkman Center’s thoughtful and exhaustive report, Next Generation Connectivity: A review of broadband Internet transition and policy from around the world, adds high-speed Internet access policy to the list of American exceptions.

Some of the report’s highlights:

  • Across many sets of rankings published by a variety of actors, the US is a weak performer on prices for high-speed access.  Prices in this country are high and speeds are relatively slow.  US performance has declined relative to other countries.
  • There is a very broad consensus in developed countries outside the US that open access policies requiring shared infrastructure are both necessary (to competition, ubiquity, lower prices, higher speeds) and work.  These policies prompt competition by lowering barriers to entry, thus enabling lower prices and higher speeds.
  • Greater fiber penetration is a goal of many countries, because of its vastly higher capacity and upgradeability.
  • High-speed Internet access is related to economic growth.
  • Incumbents all over the world always complain about open access, but professional, persistent regulators succeed.
  • There are many different ways to implement open access.
  • The theory that unbundling deters investment is not proven by either empirical or theoretical literature.  Nor have the theories that attempt to explain why unbundling works been proven.  But countries that have effectively pursued open access have done better than the US has over the last few years - so it’s very valuable to compare the case studies in those countries to our situation.

This report is an enormous contribution.  It shows that the US has much to learn from the rest of the world.

Full post as published by Susan Crawford Blog on February 16, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.004 secs (from cache 10/31/26 02:46:30)