ADVERTISEMENT



Google       
Call (866) 635-2689 for a free Personal Injury evaluation by attorney in your area.

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Personal Injury Law Blogs -> Richmond Virginia Personal Injury Lawyer

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Personal Injury Law

: Richmond Virginia Personal Injury Lawyer

Mr. Toyoda, Why is Toyota Hiding its Black Box Data?

By Michael Phelan

ADVERTISEMENTS

Automobile product liability lawyers already knew that Toyota's litigation strategy includes blocking access to data stored in its vehicles' on-board black box, also known as Event Data Recorders (EDRs). Toyota's duplicity has included:

- refusing to produce key information stored on the EDR

- prohibiting everyone in the country from downloading EDR data except the one Toyota expert whose laptop contains the proprietary software needed to read the data following a crash

- when ordered by a court to provide the data, either settling to avoid production or producing only a paper printout with key columns left blank.

The Associated Press has uncovered another layer of deception. Toyota admitted to the AP that its EDRs record data from five seconds before until two seconds after an air bag deploys, and that such data includes"data on the brake's position and the antilock brake system," both key issues in sudden acceleration lawsuits. This admission is significant in light of Toyota's position in two wrongful death lawsuits involving sudden unintended acceleration. In a Texas case, police requested the EDR data from a 2008 Avalon that crashed through a fence, struck a tree, and kept going into a pond. The police received from Toyota an EDR readout listing as "off" any information on acceleration or braking. In an Indiana case, the driver claimed before she died that she stood on the brake pedal with both feet but could not stop her 2003 Camry. Her family was told by Toyota that there was "no sensor that would have preserved information regarding the accelerator and brake positions at the time of impact."

Toyota's EDR system has been in use since 2001. It admitted to the AP that the EDR records "data on the brake's position adn the antilock brake system." So why did the readout produced to the police in the Texas case say "off" with respect to information on acceleration or braking? The plaintiff lawyer in the case contends that Toyota may have deliberately stopped allowing the EDRs to collect acclerator and braking data so that it would not be forced to produce such data in court cases.

It's time to aks Mr. Toyoda some tough questions.

Originally posted at InjuryBoard by Michael Phelan

Full post as published by Richmond Virginia Personal Injury Lawyer on March 06, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.016 secs (new cache)