Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Journals Blogs -> Harvard International Law Journal Digest
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal Journals
: Harvard International Law Journal DigestConviction of Group for Wearing Religious Clothing Overturned by European Court of Human Rights
By eatkinson
In Ahmet Arslan and Others v. Turkey, the European Court of Human Rights overturned, by a vote of 6-1, a 1997 decision by the Turkish courts convicting 127 Turkish nationals of breaking two laws, one against wearing headgear and the other against wearing religious clothing in public other than for religious ceremonies. The applicants, members of a religious group known as Aczimendi tarikatÿ, claimed that their conviction violated Article 9 (freedom of thought, conscience, and religion) of the European Convention on Human Rights. The ECtHR found that the decision of the Turkish courts amounted to violation of the applicants? freedom of conscience and religion by prohibiting their expression of religion through their clothing. The court noted that it might have accepted that strict maintenance of a secular system was important for Turkey?s democracy and public safety, but that the Turkish judicial decisions at issue had failed to rely on that justification. The Court further noted that, unlike several other religious dress cases it had decided, the applicants here were punished for their religious dress in public areas that were open to all, rather than in public establishments where the state’s interest in religious neutrality might outweigh the individual’s right to manifest his or her religion.
The clothing mandated by Aczimendi tarikatÿ religious order includes a turban, baggy pants, a tunic, and a stick. Applicants had been arrested in 1996 while walking to the Kocatepe Mosque in Ankara, and filed their petition with the ECtHR in 1997.
For more information, see here and here.
Full post as published by Harvard International Law Journal Digest on March 03, 2010 (boomark / email).
Heart of Atlanta v United States
Supreme Court Decision: Civil Rights Act Protected by Interstate Commerce Clause
Baseball Players Named in Mitchell Report
Major League Baseball Players using Performance Enhancing Drugs
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
Cumulative Voting
Protecting minority shareholder interests
The Civil Rights Act of 1871
Law bans discrimination enacted under color of state law
Civil / Human Rights
alleging violations of basic human and civil rights.
US Federal Government
allegedly violated the niversal Declaration of Human Rights by deporting undocumented parents of US born children.
Clergy Molester
Religious group to pay $1.3 million in priest molestation settlement.
Religious Decorations
Oklahoma City to pay attorney fees in religious freedom violations lawsuit.
Conair
Recalls Clothing Irons due to Fire hazard
Rally Rights
Gettysburg Borough awards arrested protester $22,500 civil rights settlement.

European Human Rights Court Says Turkey Violated Rights In Conviction For Clothing
Europe court rules France school could expel Muslim students for headscarves
European Court: Greece Violated Religious Rights of Bar Applicant








