Academic

KINDA DIFFERENT FROM THE ?TEA PARTY? COVERAGE: Soft-focus reporting on the ?coffee party.? Plus, f?

By Glenn Reynolds

KINDA DIFFERENT FROM THE “TEA PARTY” COVERAGE: Soft-focus reporting on the “coffee party.” Plus, from Allah, “Exit observation: I?m getting a distinct ‘beta male’ vibe from this group. Does that mean I have to root for them?”

UPDATE: Reader Aaron G. emails:

So the New York Times article describes the Coffee Party’s origin thus:

“The snowballing response made her the de facto coordinator of Coffee Party USA, with goals far loftier than its oopsy-daisy origin: promote civility and inclusiveness in political discourse, engage the government not as an enemy but as the collective will of the people, push leaders to enact the progressive change for which 52.9 percent of the country voted in 2008.”

Except the woman mentioned as starting it-Annabel Park-is not some Jane Shmo who got thrust into it by accident, she’s a career activist. A fact that is not exactly hidden either. The first results for her name on google bring up her Linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/annabelpark .

Spoiler: the only private sector work listed is “Strategy Analyst: The New York Times”

Oops.

Full post as published by Instapundit.com on March 02, 2010 (boomark / email).