Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Corporate & Securities Law Blogs -> The Startup Lawyer
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Corporate & Securities Law
: The Startup LawyerGet a Deal Done with a Go Shop Clause
By Ryan
When acquiring a company, you typically want to lock down your target and prevent it from seeking other potential buyers (see no shop clause). But in some situations, allowing your target to shop the deal around, under the terms of a “go shop” clause, can actually facilitate the transaction and get the deal done.
Typically, large acquisition targets like having a go shop provision because it allows their board of directors to fend off shareholder criticism for not obtaining maximum price for the buyout. For example, a go shop clause was used when Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. bought First Data Corp., the world’s largest processor of credit-card payments, for about $25.6 billion in one of the largest leveraged buyouts ever. First Data had 50 days to seek out higher bidders under the go shop provision. However, the use of go shop provisions is not limited to these mega deals.
Small acquisitions can also benefit by using go shop clauses. The small target company may not have a million shareholders to please, but there will likely be a valuation disagreement amongst the target’s co-founders.
Inevitably, one co-founder with caviar dreams will come up with some sky-high valuation based upon another (dissimilar) deal or some (unscrupulous) business broker’s pitch.
In reality, the valuation is what the market will actually pay for the company. The go shop clause ultimately accomplishes this task. After sufficient time on the market, the target’s co-founders should now understand what their company is really worth, and more importantly, they should all be on the same page.
Therefore, when acquiring a company, allowing your target to shop around can actually increase the chances of an acquisition, depending on the circumstances.
Full post as published by The Startup Lawyer on October 29, 2007 (boomark / email).
Heart of Atlanta v United States
Supreme Court Decision: Civil Rights Act Protected by Interstate Commerce Clause
Hurricane Claims
State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. reaches settlement deal with Mississippi Attorney General Jim Hood.
Requip
alleging behavior urges users to gamble, shop, and eat compulsively.
False Abuse Accusations
Boothbay Harbor Central School District pays shop teacher $320,000 defamation settlement.

Stop and Shop Makes Big Deal Over REAL DEAL, Whole Foods Changes To WHOLE DEAL
Indiana: Judge accepts deal in sex shop dispute
Ninth Circuit Limits Survival Clause in Deal Governed by California Law
How NOT to handle criticism: Shop To Earn and Shop To Earth
Whats NY and NC Law on No Shops in Letters of Intent









