ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Health Law Blogs -> HealthBlawg

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Health Law

: HealthBlawg

MPFS in Crisis: Holding of Claims for Services Paid Under the 2010 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule

By David Harlow

ADVERTISEMENTS

Days of Future Passed (or: deja vu all over again). 

Late Friday, after business hours, CMS pushed the following announcement via its physician information listserv:

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) is working with Congress, health care providers, and the beneficiary community to avoid disruption in the delivery of health care services and payment of claims for physicians, non-physician practitioners, and other providers of services paid under the Medicare physician fee schedule. As you are aware, the Department of Defense Appropriations Act of 2010 provided a zero percent (0%) update to the 2010 MPFS effective for dates of service January 1, 2010, through February 28, 2010. 

We believe Congress is working to avoid the negative update that will take effect March 1.  Consequently, CMS has instructed its contractors to hold claims containing services paid under the MPFS for the first 10 business days of March. The holding of MPFS claims will only affect claims with dates of service March 1, 2010, and forward.  This hold should have a minimum impact on provider cash flow because, under current law, clean electronic claims are not paid any sooner than 14 calendar days (29 for paper claims) after the date of receipt.  Be on the alert for more information about the 2010 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Update.

It's exhausting already, but CMS published a rule requiring a 21.5% 2010 MPFS cut and Congress dutifully rolled back the damage -- but only for two months.  The cut is effective March 1, which is why CMS had to step in as outlined above, basically giving Congress a week to do something.

Why such a high cut?  As I've written earlier:

That's because Congress has overridden every other cut mandated by the law since 2002, yet has not taken the time to rethink it -- even though it called for a review in 2005's DRA, and MedPAC obliged in 2007.  To cut to the chase, MedPAC recommended that Congress either (a) come up with another cockamamie formula or (b) repeal the SGR and develop incentives for providers to provide higher quality care at lower cost.  Yes, they've done a fine job so far . . . .

CMS has had to take the last-minute administrative approach in the past, to give Congress time to offer another band-aid, or temporary fix.  Here's hoping that some comprehensive fix can be worked through per MedPAC's 2007 recommendations.   

David Harlow
The Harlow Group LLC
Health Care Law and Consulting

Full post as published by HealthBlawg on February 26, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0152 secs (new cache)