ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Research Blogs -> Slaw.ca

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal Research

: Slaw.ca

Spying On Students Through Their Computers

By John Gregory

ADVERTISEMENTS

Apparently, according to Boing Boing, a high school in Pennsylvania supplied students with laptop computers ? with the unusual and unannounced feature that the school could remotely turn on the webcams installed in the computers and watch the students away from the school, such as at home, without the students knowing about it.

A lot of people find this very offensive ? but what is the offence, exactly, as a matter of law?

Is it the unauthorized use of the computer? It?s the school?s computer. Does that make a difference? Does it make a difference if the terms of use that the students had to sign before getting the computer (normally no doubt without reading them) said that the school could check on the student?s behaviour, without saying how?

There is a class action going on, or seeking permission to be launched, in Pennsylvania, in part at least under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, which deals with unauthorized access to computers. Here the computers are having unauthorized access to the students (except that the issue is the school authorities? access?.). Would a court have any trouble finding that images captured by the webcam were data, access to which was unauthorized, even by the owner of the computer?

Is there a privacy offence in the provinces that do not have private-sector privacy laws? Assume that the school is not making commercial use of the images of the students, so PIPEDA would not apply.

What other ground of civil liability do you see?

Is there another criminal offence going on? Would it matter if any of the images seen (and capable of storage, whether or not routinely stored) could have some sexual content, if only seeing someone undressing? Would that create a child pornography offence?

Is it wiretapping (or illegal interception of communications)?

Full post as published by Slaw.ca on February 19, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0128 secs (new cache)