Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Sentencing Law and Policy
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Sentencing Law and PolicyEighth Circuit affirms large above-guideline sentence
By Douglas A. Berman
ADVERTISEMENTS
The Eighth Circuit today in US v. Austad, No. 07-1376 (8th Cir. Mar. 5, 2008) (available here), affirms an above-guideline sentence with heavy reliance on Gall. Here is the start and end:Christopher Austad (Austad) pled guilty to mailing threatening communications in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 876(c). After calculating a sentencing Guidelines range of 37 to 46 months imprisonment, the district court sentenced Austad to 84 months imprisonment. Austad appeals, arguing the sentence is unreasonable, and that the district court failed to consider Austad?s history and circumstances. We affirm....
As the Supreme Court reminds us [in Gall], ?[t]he sentencing judge is in a superior position to find facts and judge their import under § 3553(a) in the individual case...continue to full postFull post as published by Sentencing Law and Policy on March 05, 2008 (boomark / email).
Lawsuits and Settlements
Specialty Lamp International
Recalls Counterfeit Circuit Breakers
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Gall: Reasonableness Review is Deferential
Booker Reasonableness in the First
Eighth Circuit Affirms Video Game Decision; Blocks Enforcement of Minnesota Video Game Law
Eighth Circuit Affirms Lower Court Dismissal of "True Threat" Student Creative Writing Case
CA1: First says that Pho withstands Kimbrough, regardless of text








