Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Personal Injury Law Blogs -> Missouri Injury Law Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Personal Injury Law
: Missouri Injury Law BlogIllinois Supreme Court rules Medical Malpractice Caps are Unconstitutional
By Benjamin J. Sansone, Esq.
Illinois personal injury lawyers that represent medical malpractice victims will be ale to seek justice and full compensation for their clients now that the Illinois Supreme Court has ruled non-economic damages in medical malpractice cases violates the Illinois Constitution. Under the law victims could be awarded no more than $500,000 in non-economic damages against doctors and $1 million against hospitals. Non-economic damages are damages usually called "pain and suffering" which compensate for disability, disfigurement, ongoing and past symptoms and hardship.
Of course, the AMA and other tort reform groups immediately criticize the decision as damaging the quality and access to health care for all. It is easy to deny victims justice through "tort reform" until you have been one, I guarantee, none of those proponents have ever had a family member or close friend who has been a victim of malpractice, because their tune would change very quickly.
The Court made a very logical and reasonable decision concluding that the caps violated the separation of powers clause of the Illinois Constitution because the legislature cannot make case-by-case determinations, separations of powers concerns would be violated by the ?legislative attempt to mandate legal conclusions.?
There are already mechanisms to prevent frivolous lawsuits and excessive awards through judiciary powers on a case by case basis, they are called, motions to dismiss, summary judgments, a jury, remittitur, etc ...
The courts are constitutionally empowered, and indeed obligated, to reduce excessive verdicts where appropriate in light of the evidence adduced in a particular case. But reducing damages by operation of law, without regard to the specific circumstances, is unconstitutional. Quite frankly, many legislators and tort reform groups will not be happy until medical malpractice cases are completely barred, which is one of the main purposes behind the caps.
Full post as published by Missouri Injury Law Blog on February 04, 2010 (boomark / email).
National Practitioner Data Bank Fact
NPDB identifies unprofessional healthcare practitioners
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Unwed Fathers' Rights in Adoption
Landmark Cases in Adoption Law Shape Law with respect to Unwed Fathers
Discouraging Union Organizers
Strict work place rules
University of Illinois Medical Center
Potential $14 Million in Malpractice Settlements
Medical Malpractice
medical malpractice lawsuit.
Birthing Malpractice
Kaiser Permanente pays $3.2 million medical malpractice settlement.
Intentional Contamination
Northwestern Medical Center pays former orthopedic surgery $4 million medical malpractice settlement.
Medical Malpractice Suit Settled for $1.69 Million
Medical Malpractice Suit Settled for $1.69 Million
Medical Malpractice Suits Brings $37M Award
Medical Malpractice Suits Brings $37M Award

Caps on Damages Unconstitutional for Victims of Malpractice
Illinois Cap on Medical Malpractice Damages Unconstitutional
Case Law Update: Medical Malpractice Caps Deemed Unconstitutional in Illinois
Illinois Supreme Court Set to Release Opinion on Medical Malpractice Caps
Illinois Supreme Court to rule on Medical Malpractice
Illinois Declares Medical Malpractice Caps Unconstitutional







