ADVERTISEMENT



Google       
Call (866) 635-2689 for a free Personal Injury evaluation by attorney in your area.

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Personal Injury Law Blogs -> Drug Injury Watch

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Personal Injury Law

: Drug Injury Watch

February 2010: Fosamax Federal Court MDL Litigation Update; Next Trial Starts In Mid-April

By Tom Lamb

ADVERTISEMENTS

Merck Lost Its Attempt To Have Louise Maley's Fosamax Lawsuit Dismissed Before Her April 19, 2010 Trial Date

(Posted by Tom Lamb at DrugInjuryWatch.com)

We have been reporting about the three bellwether trial cases for the federal court Fosamax MDL and, in this article, we continue to do so.

To start, Louise H. Maley v. Merck & Co. Inc. is the next Fosamax case set for trial in the federal court MDL, and this trial will start as scheduled on April 19, 2010.

Recent efforts by Defendant Merck to avoid this Maley Fosamax trial were summarized in a January 28, 2010 news article, "Merck Loses Dismissal Bid in Third Fosamax Case", by Bloomberg reporter Thom Weidlich:

Merck & Co. lost its bid to dismiss the third case scheduled for trial over claims its osteoporosis drug Fosamax caused so-called jaw death.

The claim of the plaintiff, Louise Maley, ?does not fail as a matter of law from a lack of evidence of exposed necrotic bone,? U.S. District Judge John Keenan in Manhattan wrote in a ruling entered into the case docket today. ?Specific causation remains a material issue of fact for the jury.?

A trial is scheduled for April 19. Maley, of Muncie, Indiana, said she developed osteonecrosis of the jaw, or ONJ, by taking Fosamax, according to her complaint filed in May 2006....

Keenan declined to grant Merck?s request for a so-called summary judgment on Maley?s claim that the drugmaker failed to warn about Fosamax?s dangers. [Maley] didn?t contest Merck?s dismissal request on her strict-liability and warranty claims, and the judge tossed those.

This January 28 Bloomberg article also provides an overview of the Fosamax litigation in terms of the number of Fosamax lawsuits filed and the money Merck has reserved for the defense of those Fosamax cases:

Merck, based in Whitehouse Station, New Jersey, as of Sept. 30 faced about 953 Fosamax cases, including suits with multiple patients, the company said in a Nov. 2 regulatory filing. About 700 lawsuits have been consolidated before Keenan for evidence gathering....

As of Sept. 30, Merck set aside $48 million for defending the litigation, according to the regulatory filing. It hasn?t earmarked any money for damages.

In closing, the next scheduled Fosamax trial is Maley v. Merck & Co., 06-cv-4110, which is one of the hundreds of pending Fosamax lawsuits in In Re Fosamax Products Liability Litigation, MDL 1789, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York (Manhattan).

______________________________________________________________________________

DrugInjuryLaw.com: Legal Information And News About Prescription Drug Side Effects

Full post as published by Drug Injury Watch on February 02, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0123 secs (new cache)