Personal Injury Law

Worker Injured at BP plant wins $1.72 million Personal Injury Lawsuit Verdict

By Michael

A Texas man who filed a personal injury lawsuit after he was severely hurt in an accident at petroleum magnate BP?s Texas City oil refinery won a $1.72 million verdict in a recent court ruling.

Ernesto Tamez and his wife Maria filed the industrial accident lawsuit against Maxim Crane Works, an industrial company based in Pennsylvania. The lawsuit was filed about four years after Tamez was injured at the refinery. A jury at a Galveston County, Texas courthouse ruled Maxim was fully liable for the accident, according to release from Arnold & Itkin law office.

According to court documents, Tamez was working at the refinery on January 18, 2006 when he was struck by an oil burner. The burner was hoisted in the air by a crane operated by a Maxim worker. Tamez reportedly sustained crushing injuries to his neck, back, shoulder and ribs, which required extensive surgery to repair.

Tamez was awarded $300,000 in lost wages, $550,000 in medical expenses and $170,000 for his wife in the decision.

“It has taken four years to get to this point, but our hope is that this verdict will help our client and his family move on with their life,” Cory Itkin, who served as one of Tamez?s injury attorneys, said in the release.

Last December, a federal jury awarded $100 million in damages to 10 workers who were exposed to toxic fumes at the Texas City refinery.

The ruling was the first in about 100 similar suits against the company from workers and residents in the area who claim BP has not taken enough measures to reduce the release of harmful fumes from the refinery.

The Texas City refinery has a history of other safety violations, including an explosion at the facility in March 2005. According to CBS, 15 workers were killed and least 170 were injured in the accident at the site, which occupies a two square miles.

BP was fined a record $87.4 million in November 2009 by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration for falling short of needed efforts to safely rebuild the plant after the explosion, The Wall Street Journal reported.

On March 23, 2005, contractors working at the plant had restarted a unit that was shut down for repairs. The unit was filled with gasoline but it overflowed and then filled up an emergency backup unit. The end result of the two overflows was a geyser-like spurt of gasoline into the air, followed by the explosion, CBS reported in 2005.

Full post as published by The Injury Blog on February 02, 2010 (boomark / email).