Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Sex Crimes
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Sex CrimesKerr on Comstock
By Corey Rayburnyung
ADVERTISEMENTS
Orin Kerr at Volokh Conspiracy actually attended the Comstock argument and had these thoughts about how things went:Just based on my recollections of the argument, I thought SG Kagan made a much broader Commerce Clause argument at oral argument than was made in the Government?s brief. Indeed, her argument struck me as sort of shockingly broad: She argued that the Constitution gives the federal government the general power ?to run a responsible criminal justice system,? and that anything Congress plausibly thought a part of running a ?responsible criminal justice system? was within the scope of federal power. Justice Scalia would have none of it, as you might imagine, but I couldn?t tell if he had any other votes. My guess from the argument is that the Court will uphold the statute on the narrower grounds offered by the Government?s brief...continue to full postFull post as published by Sex Crimes on January 12, 2010 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Assessing the Comstock Oral Argument
The Comstock Case, Gonzales v. Raich, and the Limits of Federal Power:
Comstock and National Security Detentions
Court Hears Arguments in Comstock







