Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Federal Judiciary Blogs -> SCOTUSBLOG
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Federal Judiciary
: SCOTUSBLOGCampaign disclosure rules upheld
By Akin Gump Supreme Court Practice Group
The Supreme Court’s ruling on campaign finance upheld these requirements:
** Disclosure requirement: Any corporation that spends more than $10,000 in a year to produce or air the kind of election season ad covered by federal restrictions must file a report with the Federal Election Commission revealing the names and addresses of anyone who contributed $1,000 or more to the ad’s preparation or distribution.
** Disclaimer requirement: If a political ad is not authorized by a candidate or a political committee, the broadcast of the ad must say who is responsible for its content, plus the name and address of the group behind the ad.
Justice Clarence Thomas was the lone dissenter as the Court upheld those requirements.
Full post as published by SCOTUSBLOG on January 21, 2010 (boomark / email).
Discouraging Union Organizers
Strict work place rules
VA Sets New Benefit Rules for Agent Orange-Related Ilnesses
Agent Orange-Related Ilnesses VA Sets New Benefit Rules
Florida State Settles with Feds over Disclosure of Personal Driver Info
Florida State Settles with Feds over Disclosure of Personal Driver Info
Vytorin Marketing
alleged false claims in marketing campaign.
Officer Firing Upheld
Pueblo pays $20,000 settlement to rightfully discharged officer.

California campaign financing stories
Fontana mayor violated campaign disclosure law, commission says (San Bernardino Sun)
New Earmark Disclosure Rules and Statutory Interpretation
Disclosure of Contributors to Ballot Measures:
Justice Thomas Says No to Disclosure, Blames Internet
Noveck on "Campaign Finance Disclosure and the Legislative Process"








