Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Bailout Blogs -> Calculated Risk
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Bailout
: Calculated RiskPrincipal Reduction and Walking Away
By Anonymous
ADVERTISEMENTS
A couple of quotes from an article by James Hagerty in the WSJ: Is Slashing Mortgage Principal the Answer? ... Assistant Treasury Secretary Michael Barr ... suggested that there would be a risk that such a [principal] program would change a lot of borrowers? behavior. ?Most people, most of the time, make their mortgage payments ... even if they?re underwater,? Mr. Barr noted. ?You have to be quite careful not to design a program that induces more people to walk away? ...This is a major concern. A couple weeks ago I wrote: New Research on Mortgage Modifications and Principal Reduction
Imagine what would happen to Wells Fargo or Bank of America if their borrowers found out that the banks would substantially reduce their principal if they were 1) underwater (negative equity), and 2) stopped making their payments. The delinquency rate and losses would skyrocket!Because of this risk, a macro principal reduction program is very unlikely.
And another quote from the WSJ:
Tom Capasse, a principal at Waterfall Asset Management LLC, a New York-based investor in mortgages, says it?s too late to prevent a ?seismic shift? in borrower behavior ... ?There used to be a scarlet D on your forehead if you defaulted,? says Mr. Capasse. ?Now it?s a badge of honor.?Not quite a "badge of honor", but the widespread acceptance of "walking away" has been one of the greatest fears of lenders for some time.
Full post as published by Calculated Risk on January 18, 2010 (boomark / email).
Lawsuits and Settlements
Phone Bill Reduction
Qwest agrees to $16 million settlement in overcharging lawsuit.
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Concerns about principals skills and judgment justified non-promotion
NCCI Announces 6.8% Rate Reduction Request
The Psychology of "Walking Away"
FINRA Reminds Firms of Obligations Regarding Principal-Protected Notes








