Home -> Law Blog Directory -> International Law Blogs -> China Law Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

International Law

: China Law Blog

Putinism, Singapore, And China. The Impact Of It All.

By Dan Harris and Steve Dickinson

ADVERTISEMENTS

Very interesting post on the Thomas P.M. Barnett Blog, entitled,Who's afraid of Vladimir Putin? The post is on a very well reasoned article in Foreign Affiars Magazine, by Michael McFaul and Kathryn Stoner-Weiss, entitled, 'The Myth of the Authoritarian Model: How Putin's Crackdown Holds Russia Back.' The thesis of the Foreign Affairs article is that Russia's economy would actually be doing even better without Putin and Putinism. Barnett's thesis is the following:

Putinism, if successful, is a phase--at best a recovery model, not a long-term economic model. The key will be: Will Putin accept the inevitable waning of his personal power (already begun by naming his successor)? I think he'll have no choice and in a dozen years we'll be venerating him like Lee Kuan Yew, but hardly pretending like he found some new model that threatens the legitimacy of liberal democracies. Ditto with the Chinese. Why must we constantly get so wobbly all the time over any success that does not mirror our current state? Especially when our own journey to this mature point wasn't pretty and featured all sorts of bad stuff that we condemn others for today? As always, a little more belief in ourselves would be nice. If all Putinism aspires to is raw materials authoritarianism, then that's all it will achieve. That doesn't scare me and it shouldn't scare you. The A game model in globalization is a market economy plus liberal democracy. If you want risk-taking and innovation and competitive drive, then you have to accommodate it in all its demands. Authoritarianism, well-funded, can buy you the team, but it can't make it win over the long haul. Success simply makes people too uppity and demanding.

Nothing terribly new here, but very well expressed, and obviously relevant for China as well.

Full post as published by China Law Blog on March 03, 2008 (boomark / email).