ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Research Blogs -> Slaw.ca

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal Research

: Slaw.ca

Trade-mark prosecution: more hurry, less wait

By Jeanette Lee

ADVERTISEMENTS

Canadian trade-mark applicants and their agents must continue to be mindful of a trend at the Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO) to compress timelines for trade-mark prosecution and proceedings.

After months of consultation period, CIPO has released a new Practice Notice on January 11, 2010 on extensions of time in trade-mark examination. Effective March 11, 2010, the Trade-marks Office will generally grant an applicant one (1) extension of time of up to a maximum of six (6) months to file a response to an examiner’s report, if the request is justified. No requests for any further extensions of time will generally be considered unless the applicant can demonstrate exceptional circumstances for failure to file a “proper response”. Furthermore, the Office considers that a proper response consists of a response wherein all of the Examiner’s objections and/or requests have been addressed.

The Practice Notice outlines some examples of exceptional circumstances that would justify a further extension of time, such as a recent change in trade-mark agent, assignment of the mark, awaiting certified copies of a corresponding foreign pending application, resolving a confusion objection due to a possible change in status of the cited mark, a dispute over that mark, or seeking consent from an official mark holder, and other serious and unforseen circumstances.

This change means that Canadian trade-mark applicants and their agents will have less flexibility and less time in which to keep applications pending, and may likewise increase pressure on agents and applicants to confirm their strategy and prepare a full response to the Examiner under a compressed timeframe.

Full post as published by Slaw.ca on January 12, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0127 secs (new cache)