Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> Likelihood of Confusion
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Intellectual Property Law
: Likelihood of ConfusionFamous marks doctrine dunked again
By Ronald D. Coleman, Esq.
ADVERTISEMENTS
Las Vegas Trademark Attorney reports that the Second Circuit has taken the “advice” of the New York Court of Appeals and rendered a final decision in the BUKHARA ?famous marks doctrine? case. Writing about the original Second Circuit opinion from last year, he says:
The court even acknowledged that its decision to reject the ?famous marks? [...]Full post as published by Likelihood of Confusion on March 03, 2008 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Second Circuit: Famous marks doctrine doesn't support NY unfair competition claim
New York Court of Appeals Says Yes and No to "Famous Marks" Doctrine
No Famous or Well-Known Marks Doctrine in New York
Second Circuit Requires Use of Famous Marks for Dilution Claim under NY Common Law
If you can make it anywhere, you can make it here: foreign famous marks in NY
New Trade Marks Office practice to World and Land marks








