ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Writing Blogs -> Set in Style

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal Writing

: Set in Style

Why Lawyers Need Editors

ADVERTISEMENTS

Lawyers need editors for this reason: they’re authors. They write client alerts, newsletter articles, and seminar materials published by their firms, and by-lined articles published by others. Some maintain blogs.

Lawyers need editors for this reason too: they’re human. Not only are they capable of error, but they’re susceptible to an occupational hazard. Since they spend so much time writing legal matter and so little time writing promotional matter (e.g., client alerts), they tend to approach the latter just like the former.

The result is promotional material that’s written like a legal brief ? it’s overly formal, far too wordy, and much more difficult to parse than it should be (especially when the target audience includes not only corporate counselors, but those who influence them, and others*).

Here’s a quick example. Consider the following intro to a client alert written by an attorney without an editor:

On September 22, 2009, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (?EPA?) promulgated its long awaited final rule (?Rule?) that imposes a mandatory national system for monitoring and reporting greenhouse gas (?GHGs?) emissions.1 The Rule enables EPA to collect comprehensive, economy-wide GHG emissions data that can be analyzed on both geographic
and facility-specific levels.

Compare that to this intro to a client written by the same attorney with an editor:

On Monday, the EPA issued a final ruling that greenhouse gases posed a danger to human health and the environment. The ruling paves the way for a national system for regulating greenhouse gas emissions.

What’s different, and why?

What’s Different Why
The latter version is not only shorter, it’s more accurate. This is to satisfy busy readers who value their time and want accurate information quickly.
Environmental Protection Agency (?EPA?) is replaced with EPA. The audience for a New York Times article doesn’t need to be told what EPA means; ditto for the audience for this client alert.
The date (September 22, 2009) was eliminated. The client alert bears a date of publication at the top; it doesn’t have to be repeated.
monitoring and reporting was replaced with regulating It’s shorter, and more accurate.
promulgated was replaced with issued Why  use a four-syllable word when two will do?
The second sentence was deleted. It was bulky and inappropriate for an intro.

______
* To attract journalists looking for quotes, the intro has to satisfy a very broad audience.

Full post as published by Set in Style on January 07, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.013 secs (new cache)