ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> International Law Blogs -> International Extradition Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

International Law

: International Extradition Blog

Extradition from Brazil to the United States?Pedro Paulo dos Santos

ADVERTISEMENTS
Pedro Paulo dos Santos served as Georgetown University?s associate director and program coordinator of the university?s Brazilian Studies Program from 2002 through 2005.[1] In July, 2006, a ?federal grand jury indicted [Mr.] dos Santos in his absence ? on charges of bank fraud, mail fraud, money laundering and theft.?[2] The charges stem from allegations that he embezzled more than $300,000 from the university and then fled to Brazil, where it is unclear whether he faces extradition proceedings.[3] According to Channing Phillips, a spokesman for the US Attorneys Office in the District of Columbia, while Mr. dos Santos is believed to still be in Brazil, Justice Department policy prohibits him from making any public comment about potential extraditions.[4]

The extradition treaty[5] between the United States and Brazil was signed on January 13, 1961, with a protocol[6] being signed on June 18, 1062; both entered into force on December 17, 1964. The treaty contains a laundry list of offenses for which extradition can be had, including such crimes as malicious wounding, bigamy, arson, piracy, malicious destruction of infrastructure, counterfeiting, embezzlement, larceny, fraud, bribery, bankruptcy fraud, drug trafficking, and smuggling, among many others.[7] Extradition, however, will not occur?even if the crime allegedly committed is an enumerated offense?in the following circumstances:

  • when the requested State is competent to prosecute the individual and it intends to exercise its own jurisdiction accordingly;
  • when the individual is already being prosecuted by the requested State;
  • when the prosecution is barred by the statute of limitations;
  • when the individual would have to appear before an extraordinary tribunal or court in the requesting State;
  • when the crime is purely military; or
  • when the crime is of a political character.[8]
Furthermore, according to the protocol to the treaty, neither country is obliged to extradite its own nationals, but the executive authority may elect to do so, so long as the requested State?s Constitution or laws do not prohibit it.[9]



[1] Robert Heberle, Former GU Employee Wanted for Fraud, The Hoya, Jan. 30, 2007.
[2] Id.
[3] Id.
[4] Id.
[5] Extradition Treaty, Jan. 13, 1961, U.S.-Braz., 15 U.S.T. 2093.
[6] Protocol to Extradition Treaty, Jun. 18, 1962, U.S.-Braz., 15 U.S.T. 2112.
[7] Treaty, art. II.
[8] Id. art. V.
[9] Protocol, art. I.

Full post as published by International Extradition Blog on January 30, 2007 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0167 secs (new cache)