Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Patent Law Blogs -> Patently Obvious
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Patent Law
: Patently ObviousRefusing to Stay Preliminary Relief Pending Appeal
By Dennis Crouch, Esq.
Bushnell v. Brunton (Fed. Cir. 2009)
Preliminary injunctions are often incredibly important in patent cases. The civil procedure is also fascinating. The appeal of a preliminary injunction often involves three steps. First, an emergency request for a temporary stay of relief is filed. If granted, the temporary stay typically lasts only until the parties can brief the question of whether relief should be stayed throughout the appeal. The third step finally gets to the merits of the appeal. Remember though that the merits of these appeals are whether an injunction should stay in place throughout the rest of the litigation. Thus, each step asks essentially the same questions about likelihood of success and the harms of action and inaction.
Bushnell's patents cover various aspects of a laser range finder. The company sued Brunton and Lanshoo in Kansas for infringement and also filed a motion for a preliminary injunction to stop the ongoing infringement. On November 25, 2009, Judge Vratil issued the preliminary injunction and Brunton immediately requested a temporary stay from the Federal Circuit. The rotating motions judge (Judge Linn) granted a temporary stay of relief that same day (November 25, 2009). [Link] However that temporary stay was intended only to last until the court could decide whether relief should be stayed for the remainder of the PI appeal. The decision on that question moved to a merits panel of Chief Judge Michel and Judges Schall and Linn.
Under the Supreme Court precedent of Hilton v. Braunskill, 481 U.S. 770 (1987), an appellate court may stay relief pending appeal when the moving party establishes a strong likelihood of succeeding on the merits of the appeal or 'failing that' when the party has a 'substantial case on the merits and the harms factors militate in its favor.' In this case, the Federal Circuit ruled that 'Brunton has not met its burden' and immediately lifted the stay (December 30, 2009 opinion). [Link] The only problem is that the decision is too late for the Christmas season.
Full post as published by Patently Obvious on January 05, 2010 (boomark / email).
How to Stop Home Foreclosure
Bankruptcy can Stop Foreclosure
The Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act
Phantom Income Relief on Debt Cancellation
Medical Records
To Stay out of Pharma's Hands
Mylicon Baby's Gas Relief Drops
Urgently Recalled Nationwide
Philip Morris
Loses Appeal, Will Pay Millions
Asbestos Mesothelioma Victim Wins Appeal of $20 Million Asbestos Cancer Verdict
Asbestos Mesothelioma Victim Wins Appeal of $20 Million Asbestos Cancer Verdict
Marriott
Hourly Wage Class Action Settlement Pending
Preliminary Settlement Reached With Soleus International
Soleus International Reaches Preliminary Settlement of Class Action

Grant of stay while preliminary injunction motion pending abuse of discretion
Magistrate Judge Leonard P. Stark: No Stay for Pending Litigation Against Infringer
Refusal to Issue Preliminary Injunction is Appealable Order
Chancery Enjoins Arbitration and Denies Both Interlocutory Appeal and Stay Pending Appeal
New opinion on undertakings pending appeal: Leung v. Verdugo Hills Hosp.







