ADVERTISEMENT



Google       
Call (866) 635-2689 for a free Personal Injury evaluation by attorney in your area.

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Personal Injury Law Blogs -> Marler Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Personal Injury Law

: Marler Blog

Murrieta family suing Organic Pastures and Sprouts in E. coli case

By Bill Marler, Esq.

ADVERTISEMENTS

The first paragraph of the North County Times article says it all:

“A Murrieta couple says it was raw milk tainted with a strain of E. coli that nearly killed their son. The owner of Organic Pastures Dairy in Fresno, where the raw milk came from, and the Sprouts store in Temecula, where the milk was purchased, each say there is no proof they are at fault.

Each side sees the facts of the case differently - It will now likely be up to a jury to decide.

According to Sprouts - The Martins bought the raw milk Chris drank in September 2006, from Sprouts on Winchester Road in Temecula. When contacted recently, Sprouts store owner Linda Watson said, "There is no information I know of that any E. coli in any raw milk was sold at our store, or anywhere else for that matter."

According to Organic Pastures - Mark McAfee, owner of Organic Pastures Dairy in Fresno, says there is no proof that his company is at fault, as also alleged in the lawsuit. "When a person sues for a food-related illness, they must be able to show a connection between a product and the person," McAfee said. "There isn't a connection here." McAfee said the pathogen was not found in any of the manure tests of his cows or in any tests of packaged dairy products from his business. "Because there isn't any connection, we feel confident we have a very strong defense," he said.  See California State Report.

According to the Martins - The Seattle-based attorney representing the Martins in their lawsuit has a different opinion. "Under California law, the whole distribution chain is strictly liable," William Marler said of both the dairy and the store. "We don't have to prove the store did anything wrong or was negligent, just that it was in the product. "Selling unpasteurized milk is a risk stores shouldn't be willing to take," he said, adding that children and elderly are at "extreme risk" from pathogens that might be in such a product. "The message here is, whether it is raw or pasteurized milk, you have to be willing to take the responsibility of making sure your product is safe for your consumers," Marler said. Marler says he has handled thousands of E. coli cases over the last 15 years, including the infamous Jack in the Box meat case. He said jury settlements are typically in the millions of dollars in E. coli lawsuits, citing one Jack in the Box settlement in which $15.6 million was awarded in the case of just one child.

Full post as published by Marler Blog on March 02, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0218 secs (new cache)