Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Litigation Blogs -> How Appealing
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Litigation
: How Appealing"Cellphone Searches"
ADVERTISEMENTS
"Cellphone Searches": Today's edition of The New York Times contains an editorial that begins, "The Ohio Supreme Court has struck an important blow for privacy rights, ruling that the police need a warrant to search a cellphone."
My earlier coverage of the Ohio Supreme Court's ruling can be accessed here.
Full post as published by How Appealing on December 26, 2009 (boomark / email).
Lawsuits and Settlements
Indianapolis
alleging the city's police are overly aggressive against the homeless in violation of the protection of free speech and unreasonable searches guaranteed in the US Constitution.
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Federal Judge Limits Location Searches Using Cellphone Data
Gadgets Killed by the Cellphone
Cellphone Accident Case Settles For Millions
New Report Raises Concern Over Cellphone Radiation







