Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> IPKat
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Intellectual Property Law
: IPKatData exclusivity and food claims in Europe
By Johanna Gibson, David Pearce, Jeremy Phillips and Ilanah Simon.
The IPKat's attention was attracted this morning to the Commission Decision of 17 December 2009 authorising a health claim on the effect of water-soluble tomato concentrate on platelet aggregation and granting the protection of proprietary data under Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council, which was published this morning on the Official Journal's website. By Article 2 of this Decision, "The scientific data and other information included in the studies identified in the Annex to this Decision shall be restricted for use for the benefit of the applicant for a period of 5 years from the date of authorisation under the conditions laid down in Article 21(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006.".This Decision follows an application by Provexis Natural Products Ltd, submitted nearly a year ago in relation to a health claim relating to the effects of water-soluble tomato concentrate (WSTC) I and II on the blood platelet activity in healthy people. The claim consisted of the immediately forgettable phrase ?Helps to maintain a healthy blood flow and benefits circulation?.
Regulation 1924/2006 of 20 December 2006 on nutrition and health claims made on foods, in effectively conferring protection on data relating to health claims, is part of the vast and growing body of European intellectual property law and, a little embarrassed, the Kat must confess that he missed it at the time of its passage. He wonders whether his readers, through their commercial activities or academic pursuits, have any experiences or insights as to the working of this Regulation and as to how it compares with the provisions relating to data exclusivity in the pharmaceutical sector.
European Food Safety Authority report on the product claim here
Full post as published by IPKat on December 18, 2009 (boomark / email).
Pet Food Recall and Deaths
Dogs and Cats Sickened by Tainted Menu Food Products
Paxil Lawsuit
Paxil Claims, Lawsuits, and Injuries
Pet Food Recall
Diamond Pet Food sets up $3.1 million class action fund for substandard dog food.
Food/Supplements
involving food poisoning, food product recalls, false advertising or labeling, vitamin, weight loss and diet supplement issues.
PETCO
Animal Food Distribution Unsanitary, Food Seized
Menu Food
$240,000 settlement reached in Hawaii class action contaminated pet food suit.
False Claims
Attorney Robert Arledge ordered to pay $5.8 million after making false Fen Phen settlement claims.
T-mobile data plans, T-mobile, t-mobile phones
T-Mobile Faces Class Action over Limited Unlimited Data Plans

Patents and Data Exclusivity: It Ain't Necessarily So
Non-Patent Exclusivity and 180-Day Exclusivity Forfeiture Slides Posted
Former House Ways and Means Economist Claims 7-Year Data Exclusivity Period Is Sufficient
Professor Grabowski's Economic Analysis of Data Exclusivity for Follow-on Biologic Drugs
Senators Hatch and Enzi Champion 12-Year Data Exclusivity in Senate
Follow-on Biologics in the News - No. 4








