Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Consumer Law Blogs -> 43(B)log
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Consumer Law
: 43(B)logConsumer protection hypo of the day
By Rebecca Tushnet
Questions: (1) Assuming the consumer changes the review and doesn't disclose that he received a hard drive for doing so, have the consumer and the retailer violated the FTCs endorsement guidelines? (2) What should the retailer have said to the consumer about changing the review, following best practices? (3) Assume that the consumer promised to change the review in return for the hard drive, but then decides that the service was so bad that he wants to leave the review in place. What does contract law have to say about this agreement, given the public policy reflected in the Guidelines?
Full post as published by 43(B)log on December 16, 2009 (boomark / email).
Truth In Lending Act
Consumer Loans and Consumer Credit Protection Act
Privacy Protection Act 42 USC 21A
Federal Newsroom Law
Germantown Primary Care Associates, P.C.
Unlawfully collected fees refunded in Consumer Protection Act violation suit.
ValueClick
allegedly violated consumer protection laws by promising ‘free’ goods that where not actually free.
Hutchinson Oil
Over $75,000 settlement reached in consumer protection lawsuit.
School Misrepresentation
Lehigh Valley College agrees to pay $200,000 settlement for violating consumer protection laws.
Internet/Technology
involving cyber law, consumer protection, internet crime, internet fraud, online gambling, e-commerce.
imbee Data Collection
Industrious Kid, Inc. pays $130,000 civil penalty for violating the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act.

Fight The Hypo Award: Mommy On The Floor
New Consumer Protection Chief Wants More Authority for FTC
ABA Consumer Protection Conference: Credit Slips out in Force
Consumer Fraud Scams: What's Old Is New Again









