ADVERTISEMENT

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Estate Planning Blogs -> Wills, Trusts & Estates Prof Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Estate Planning

: Wills, Trusts & Estates Prof Blog

California case holds that response to petition for instructions violates no-contest clause

By Trusts EstatesProf

ADVERTISEMENTS

In Cook v. Cook, 99 Cal. Rptr. 3d 913 (Cal. Ct. App. 2009), the California intermediate appellate court held that a beneficiary?s pleading violated the no-contest clause in his parents? trust when the pleading (which asserted that debts the beneficiary...

Full post as published by Wills, Trusts & Estates Prof Blog on December 15, 2009 (boomark / email).

Related Law Articles

Heart of Atlanta v United States
Supreme Court Decision: Civil Rights Act Protected by Interstate Commerce Clause

California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid

Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected

Dumb California Laws
Stupid Laws in the Sunshine State

Lawsuits and Settlements

Texas, USA
alleging the Medical Malpractice and Tort Reform Act of 2003 violates several provisions of the Constitution.

California Labor Laws
alleged violations of California labor laws such as overtime pay, discrimination and harassment.

California Firm Recalls Ready-To-Eat Pork Products
California Firm Recalls Ready-To-Eat Pork Products

Seattle Mortgage Co Faces California Class Action
Seattle Mortgage Co Faces California Class Action

California Hospitals
Fined for Shoddy Care

Whole Foods
And Other Firms Sued by California Attorney General,

Related Searches

US Law

#1 Online Legal Resource

Ask Legal Questions

US Law Directory

Class Action Lawsuits

Celebrity Justice

OJ Simpson

VIDEO: NYPD rendering first aid to Empire State Building shooter
On 08-25 at 15:46PM

Acute perpendicular parking #NYPD #NYFD
On 08-18 at 22:18PM

Parallel parking gone bad. Too much gas UES NYC
On 08-18 at 21:41PM

UES NYC
On 08-18 at 21:25PM

Twitter suspends journalist critical of broadcast partner's coverage on dubious grounds @guyadams #nbcfail #twitterfail
On 07-30 at 17:57PM

Model example of 1st Amendment suppression by the People of New York City's Michael Bloomberg #OWS #NYPD
On 07-12 at 21:07PM

AG Holder lackadaisical on Operation in our Sites domain name seizures & RIAA lobbied free speech suppression @dajaz1
On 06-08 at 22:44PM

Why is the Catholic Church going to court over Obama contraception policy? @NewYorker commentary
On 05-31 at 10:08AM

Monks sue Louisiana for right to sell caskets made from forrest destroyed by Katrina
On 05-31 at 07:47AM

Are the abortion ultrasound laws headed for the Supreme Court?
On 05-15 at 21:52PM

FOLLOW USLaw.com ON TWITTER

Custom Legal Documents

Your Blog Subscriptions Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc

Earn a law-related degree

Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.

Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

9th Circuit Holds that SORNA Prosecution Violates Ex Post Facto Clause (for Juveniles)

10th Circuit Holds 10 Commandments Monument Violates Establishment Clause

New Cert. Petition in Rep. Jefferson Speech or Debate Clause Case

No Contest Clause - Excluding Someone From Your Will Or Trust

Retroactive Requirement to Register as Sex Offenders Violates Ex Post Facto Clause When Applied to Juvenile Offenders:

"[W]e conclude that the retroactive application of SORNA's juvenile registration and reporting requirement violates the Ex Post Facto Clause of the United States Constitution."

0.0207 secs (new cache)