Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Corporate Governance Blogs -> The Race to the Bottom
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Corporate Governance
: The Race to the BottomCALPERS and Supreme Court Review of NYSE Immunity
By Michelle Larson
On January 16, 2008, the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) filed a petition for writ of certiorari requesting Supreme Court review of a decision to dismiss fraud claims against the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) based on governmental immunity. The Second Circuit’s Judge Sotomayor held that the NYSE is entitled to absolute immunity even when it abandons its quasi-governmental role as a regulator. In re: NYSE Specialists Securities Litigation (California Public Employees’ Retirement System v. New York Stock Exchange, Inc.), 503 F.3d 89 (2d Cir. 2007).
Because of the NYSE’s status as a self-regulatory organization (SRO) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the SEC delegates significant authority to the NYSE to enforce trading rules and regulations. When the NYSE stands in the shoes of the SEC, the absolute immunity that shields the government entity from liability also extends to the exchange.
In the lower courts, CalPERS’ class action lawsuit contended that the exchange effectively abandoned its regulatory role when the NYSE and the specialist firms that managed trading for its listed companies acted to defraud public investors from October 17, 1998 until October 15, 2003. Specifically, CalPERS alleged that the NYSE falsified trading records, tipped off the specialist firms to pending investigations, and worked with the specialists to hide evidence from the SEC during the class period. Petition for Writ of Certiorari at 4, California Public Employees’ Retirement System v. New York Stock Exchange, Inc., No. 07-946 (U.S. Jan. 16, 2008).
The recently filed petition asks the Supreme Court to consider whether the NYSE should be entitled to absolute immunity even when it fails to perform the regulatory function delegated to it by the SEC. CalPERS exhorts the Court to resolve what it views as the Second Circuit’s inconsistent holdings: 1) SROs are private, non-governmental actors beyond the reach of constitutional limits on governmental power; and 2) SROs are entitled to absolute immunity even when failing to perform their delegated regulatory duties.
The primary materials discussed in this post may be found at theDU Corporate Governance website. Please see earlier posts for more on SROs.
Full post as published by The Race to the Bottom on February 28, 2008 (boomark / email).
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Unwed Fathers' Rights in Adoption
Landmark Cases in Adoption Law Shape Law with respect to Unwed Fathers
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
Heart of Atlanta v United States
Supreme Court Decision: Civil Rights Act Protected by Interstate Commerce Clause
UnitedHealth Group
Pays $895 Million in CalPers Class Action
Gildan Activewear, Inc.
NYSE: GIL
Sonoco Products Co.
NYSE: SON
First American Corporation
NYSE: FAF
Fifth Third Bancorp
NASD: FITB; NYSE: FTB-PA, FTB/PA, FTB-PC or FTB/PC
State Street Corporation
NYSE:STT

Qualified Immunity and Saucier v. Katz
Patent Suit Brings Question of Immunity Before Supreme Court
SEC Remands NYSE Disciplinary Action for Reconsideration of Sanctions
NYSE Euronext Will Acquire 25% of Doha Securities Market
U.S. Supreme Court to hear prosecutor immunity case
NYSE Sells Real-Time Market Data to Google & CNBC








