Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Litigation Blogs -> The Gavel
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Litigation
: The GavelStates Also Await Ruling in Citizens United
By Peter Hardin
As Supreme Court-watchers await an opinion in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, a potential blockbuster of a campaign finance decision, the Wall Street Journal provides a good reminder of the ruling’s importance to the states.
The high court is deciding whether the government can continue to bar corporations and labor unions from spending directly from their treasuries to support or oppose candidates in federal elections. The ruling could affect how corporations spend political money in the 2010 elections, and it ultimately could affect spending on judicial elections in states where judges are elected.
States showed little interest in Citizens United at first, according to the newspaper article, when it was an obscure case involving a documentary movie slamming then-presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton. But once the Supreme Court asked in June for a re-hearing in the case and identified campaign finance regulation precedents it would reconsider, states became quite interested.
Montana’s state solicitor “saw a threat to his state’s nearly century-old campaign finance laws,” and working with Arizona’s solicitor general, “circulated a friend-of-the-court brief to other states, and 24 added their names,” the newspaper reported. In Montana, said state solicitor Anthony Johnstone, a 1912 voter initiative “has allowed…a political sphere that isn’t dominated by the one or two companies that dominated it in its early, post-territorial days.”
Justice at Stake submitted an amicus brief in the case, warning that allowing corporations to pour even more into the flood of special interest money in judicial elections ?would have a profound and negative effect on the selection of state court judges and could damage the integrity of the judiciary.? You can read the brief by clicking here. You can learn more about the Citizens United case from Gavel Grab or from a JAS press release on the case.
Full post as published by The Gavel on December 08, 2009 (boomark / email).
Recall of TYLENOL 8 Hour Caplets 50 Count Sold in The United States and Puerto Rico
TYLENOL 8 Hour Caplets 50 Count One Lot Recalled in US and Puerto Rico
Katrina Victims See Justice, Ruling Paves the Way for Class Actions
Katrina Victims See Justice Ruling Paves the Way for Class Actions
United Airlines Discriminates Against Blind Passengers
United Airlines Discriminates Against Blind Passengers
Louisiana Citizens Reaches $23 Million Settlement With Homeowners
Louisiana Citizens Reaches $23 Million Settlement With Homeowners
John Vermillion and Associates LLC et al.
allegedly misrepresented themselves as qualified financial advisers to sell living trusts and exploit senior citizens.
Cilantro
Recalled in 5 States

Supplemental Briefs in Citizens United
Former FEC Commissioners Available for Press Interviews: After Citizens United v. FEC Oral Argument
Constitutional scholarship in the United States
World Court to Rule on US Executions
Motion for Divided Argument in Citizens United








