Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Patent Law Blogs -> IPBiz
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Patent Law
: IPBizIs Patently-O thread on obviousness predictably obvious?
By Lawrence B. Ebert, Esq.
Predictably, MaxDrei speaks of the European PSA (problem and solution approach).
See previous IPBiz posts:
Obviousness: European problem and solution approach
Obviousness in interferences; Chapman and the 14- hydroxy problem in oxycodone
Interesting comment thread on Patently-O
In part, the guest poster on Patently-O, Paul Cole, brings up themes from a 2008 article in JMRIPL:
More detained comments on the suggestion are found in a paper on KSR that was published in the John Marshall Review of Intellectual Property Law in 2008[1]. For convenience of reference, the final section is set out here: (...)
Of the comment thread, in the realm of birds, there are chattering magpies (note a blog of the name) and there are macaws like Lex Luther.
For a Christmas theme on obviousness, see Patentability and the ?Long-Felt Unmet Need?
Full post as published by IPBiz on December 07, 2009 (boomark / email).

M·CAM, Inc. Launches Patently Obvious® IP Assertion Defense Service
Hindsight Bias in Obviousness Determinations
Anticipation Without Obviousness
Patently-O Bits and Bytes: Vote for Patently-O
Dependent claim can't be obvious when indepdendent claim is not; verdict vacated as inconsistent








