Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Sentencing Law and Policy
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Sentencing Law and PolicyWhat would a fully originalist approach to sentencing entail?
By Douglas A. Berman
ADVERTISEMENTS
The question in the title of this post is prompted by this interesting new piece available via SSRN by Will Tress titled "Unintended Collateral Consequences: Defining Felony in the Early American Republic." Here is the abstract:
At common law a felony was a crime that led to forfeiture of the convict?s property. In contemporary American law, a felony is usually defined as a crime that is punished by death, or imprisonment in a specially designated place (prison or penitentiary) or for a designated period of time (more than one year). The attached article examines how that change came about, and fixes the time and place of the re-definition: New York in 1828, during a revision of that state?s statutes. The choice made by the revisors, a compromise between radical reform and adherence to the common law tradition, is placed in the context of two early 19th century reform movements: Codification of the common law, and the founding of the penitentiaries...continue to full postFull post as published by Sentencing Law and Policy on December 07, 2009 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Solum on Incorporation and Originalist Theory
Chopping Down the "Living Tree" -- Or at Least Trimming it a Little
What Does Heller Say About Originalism:
New Version of "Incorporation and Originalist Theory"
Strang on Originalism & Precedent
Is the Exclusionary Rule Consistent With Originalism:








