ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Appellate Law Blogs -> Illinois Appellate Lawyer Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Appellate Law

: Illinois Appellate Lawyer Blog

Appeal Before Ruling On Right To Tax Deed Premature

By Steven R. Merican

ADVERTISEMENTS

Dennis Ballinger owned a communications tower that was erected on property in Hancock County, Illinois. He filed a petition to obtain a tax deed for the property. Pettit Land, LLC. disputed Ballinger?s petition. Pettit claimed it owned the land, but not the tower, and that it properly paid taxes for the land.

Pettit asked the court to deny Ballinger?s request for the tax deed. After a hearing on Pettit?s request, the trial court ruled in Pettit?s favor and stated: ??[I]f petitioner [Ballinger] proceeded forward to obtain a tax deed, he would only receive rights in the improvements on the site (the communications tower) and would not receive rights to the underlying ground.?

Ballinger asked the trial court to reconsider the ruling. The court denied Ballinger?s request, and ruled that its original order and the order denying reconsideration were final and appealable. So Ballinger appealed.

The Third District Illinois Appellate Court dismissed the appeal. Because the orders did not conclude the proceeding for a tax deed, they were neither final nor appealable. Here?s the way the appellate court saw it.

In the present case, the issue on appeal involves only the trial court?s ruling on a motion brought during the course of a tax deed proceeding. This appeal does not involve the trial court?s ultimate ruling granting or denying the tax deed or declaring a sale in error ? Thus, despite the trial court?s statement to the contrary, the orders in question were not ?final judgments,? as specified in [Illinois] Supreme Court Rule 301, which would provide for an appeal as a matter of right.

Read the whole opinion, Ballinger v. Pettit Land, No. 3-09-0134 (10/15/09), by clicking here.

Full post as published by Illinois Appellate Lawyer Blog on October 25, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0128 secs (new cache)