Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Academic Blogs -> Feminist Law Professors
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Academic
: Feminist Law ProfessorsSome Possible Questions
By Julie Shapiro
My last post raises a few questions, at least for me. One I have an answer for, the others I do not.
–How important is the intention to be a parent? This is the one I think I can answer. (I owe some thanks to a poster at Feminist Law Professor for a helpful hypo.) Suppose it isn’t actually the woman’s choice to continue the pregnancy through to the birth of a child. Suppose that result is forced upon her (by circumstances, by the failure of our society to make her options real or, as suggested in the hypo, by brute force). I still think that when the child is born she is a parent. It’s the fact of pregnancy/childbirth that makes her a parent. I realize in the past I have alluded (more than once) to her decision to continue the pregnancy. But the poster makes me realize that that is at best a make-weight. The performance of this essential parental role, intentional or not, makes her a parent.
I’ve been heading for this conclusion–that function should be the determinant of parental status–for some time. But somehow this little hypo caused it to gel for me here. I think there are fairly broad implications that follow from this and I’ll have to follow those up in other posts.
– When exactly does the woman become a parent? I’m committed to the idea that she is not a parent at the time of conception. And now I’m also committed to the idea that she is a parent at the time the child is born. So somewhere in there she becomes a parent. It’s tempting to say simply that she becomes a parent at the time of birth and perhaps that is the right conclusion for me. But it seems to be a little more complicated than that. If she is a parent because she has functioned as a parent then that would seem to suggest something akin to a parent/child relationship existed before the child was born. This seems inconsistent with what I’ve said earlier. I think I’ll just let this slide for now.
Having said that, I will still note that any sort of functional test for parenthood generally won’t yield nice firm rules for when parenthood begins. That’s a practical problem. It also seems that functional parenthood isn’t necessarily permanent. If you stop functioning as a parent for long enough, then you aren’t a parent any longer. Here, too, I see there could be problems ahead.
– Under my working hypothesis, all children have at least one parent (a mother) when they are born. But they may not (and in the one-night-stand situation I’ve been focused on, they do not) have a second parent. Yet I do not rule out the possibility that some children will have more than one parent at birth. How does a second person get to claim parenthood at the time of birth? Not exactly sure yet, but stay tuned.
-Julie Shapiro (cross posted to Related Topics)
Full post as published by Feminist Law Professors on February 28, 2008 (boomark / email).
Income Tax Changes for 2007
Get Answers to your Income Tax Questions

Questions To Ask Before Saying "I Do"
Answering tax questions on WalletPop
Would Law School Be Good for Me
Depositions: Critical Questions for a Defendant Doctor









