Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Local Law Blogs Blogs -> Southwest Virginia Law Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Local Law Blogs
: Southwest Virginia Law BlogThose proposed Local Rules for the W.D. Va.
By Steven R. Minor
Gen. R. 2(b) is good - civil cases should be filed in the right jury division. Long live the Big Stone Gap courthouse!
Gen. R. 11 about juror contact is sound, and Judge Jones has included something on those lines in his pre-trial order for some time.
Gen. R. 12 says: "The Court may in its discretion impose the costs of a jury where a case is settled or otherwise disposed of after it is too late to reasonably notify the jury not to appear." I guess that's based on budget concerns, but a drag. Stick that in your eleventh hour settlement demand - "and you'll indemnify me against whatever the judge makes us pay for settling so late."
Civ. R. 11 requires briefing of motions, along the lines that are required now in Judge Jones's regular scheduling order, but this rule is broader because it would include discovery motions.
Civ. R. 16 now requires scheduling orders in all cases. Judge Williams has not been entering scheduling orders in cases unless someone asked for one, I think.
Civ. R. 26 deals with expert witness disclosures. The gist is if you are going to object to expert testimony, you need to file a motion in time for the Court to rule in advance of trial.
Civ. R. 51 says file proposed jury instructions a week before trial. I think Judge Jones has been ordering this for years. He generally wants them to be e-mailed to him in word processing format as well, so he can tidy them up, but that part is not in the rule.
Civ. R. 54 is cribbed from the D. Md., and sets forth the details of how to apply for attorneys' fees in a cases where those can be recovered. You need to file a little brief and have detailed time records.
Civ. R. 56 says file for summary judgment far enough in advance of trial for the Court to rule. The scheduling orders I've seen usually set a more explicit deadline than this rule provides.
None of this seems even mildly controversial to me. I wonder what jury costs are.
Full post as published by Southwest Virginia Law Blog on November 11, 2009 (boomark / email).
Discouraging Union Organizers
Strict work place rules
VA Sets New Benefit Rules for Agent Orange-Related Ilnesses
Agent Orange-Related Ilnesses VA Sets New Benefit Rules
Settlement Proposed in Class Action Against Facebook
Facebook will Close Beacon in Proposed Settlement
Expedia Class Action Settlement Proposed for $123.4 Million
Expedia Settlement Proposed for $123.4 Million
$11,250,000 Settlement Proposed in Amkor Class Action
Amkor Reaches Proposed Settlement in Securities Class Action
Settlement Proposed in Fomoco ERISA Class Action
Fomoco ERISA Class Action Proposed Settlement Reached with Ford
WaMu Mutual Stock Class Action Settlement Proposed
WaMu Mutual Stock Class Action Settlement Proposed

New Tenth Circuit Rules Proposed; Public Comments Solicited
8th District Court Previewing Possible New Rules
Local Rules committee activity - request for input
Proposed new local rules for handling patent cases in the Northern District of Illinois
A proposed revision to proposed CA rule 1.7
Our Neighbors and Friends: District Court Seeks Comment on Pro Hac Vice Rules









