Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Miscellaneous Blogs -> the (new) legal writer
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Miscellaneous
: the (new) legal writerOf headnotes and issue statements
Ernie the Attorney had an interesting post yesterday asking how the headnotes in West digests encourage lawyers to write long-winded sentences. The answer: the headnote authors follow the senseless convention of trying to cram all the pertinent information into one sentence.
Unfortunately, lawyers who read these headnotes often imitate their style. In my world of appellate practice, this pernicious influence most often manifests itself in the issue statements in briefs. You briefwriters out there, please do this: Before you write another long, convoluted, one-sentence issue statement, check the applicable procedural rules to see whether you?re required to do that. If not, then please feel liberated to write a multi-sentence issue statement. Put your premises in the form of declarative sentences. End with a one-clause question, which should have one of these ? ? ? as its ending punctuation. It?s not hard, folks. All you have to do is write like a human being.
Full post as published by the (new) legal writer on November 19, 2009 (boomark / email).
Atlas Cold Storage
Income Trust to pay $40 million to settle a class action that claims misrepresented financial statements.
Mr. Brown Instant Coffee
Possible Melamine Contamination Prompts Canadian Agency to Issue Warning
Cipro
The FDA is seeking to add black box warnings of the risk of tendon rupture associated with Cipro and Levaquin.
The ruptures can involve Achilles tendon, shoulder, hand, bicep or thumb tendons, and is especially increased in patients older than 60, or people who have received kidney, heart or lung transplants, as well as people on steroid therapy...

"Putting West and LexisNexis Case Law Digesting Systems to the Relevancy Test"
Reining in the Results - Humans versus Computers in Online Searching
Putting West and LexisNexis Case Law Digesting Systems to the Relevancy Test
Can prior inconsistent statement be used as substantive evidence








