Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Solo Practice Blogs -> The Greatest American Lawyer
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Solo Practice
: The Greatest American LawyerIs Your Blogging In Violation of the New FTC Regulations Concerning Endorsements?
By The Greatest American Lawyer
I have seen a few significant changes in blogging over the years, but none that may be quite as important or wide-ranging as the new FTC regulations, 16 CFR Part 255, concerning endorsements. Effective December 1, 2009, bloggers who endorse a product or service must disclose whether they have a "material connection" to the advertiser that might affect the weight or credibility of the endorsement. This means that bloggers that receive cash or any other payment, including free products, for their endorsement must disclose that connection. The new regulations contain a number of examples that illustrate the various situations that may constitute a "material connection," but none of them are particularly illuminating.
The new regulations also require advertisements that convey a consumer's experience with a product or service as typical when, in reality, it is not, to disclose what the typical results would be. Advertisers can no longer portray a result and disclaim it with fine print that says, "Results not typical." The rules for celebrity endorsements under Part 255 have also changed. Celebrities must disclose their connections with an advertiser and both parties can now be held liable for untruthful or misleading advertising. Celebrities also must disclose their relationships with advertisers when they promote products outside of traditional commercials or print advertising, such as on talk shows or in interviews.Finally, if an advertisement refers to a scientific study for support, the advertiser must disclose his or her relationship to the researcher or research agency.
There are several other changes in the law that must also be complied with, as well as several new examples to illustrate the application of the pre-existing rules that have been in effect since 1980. It is important that bloggers understand these rules and examples because they can be held liable for up to $11,000 per post for a violation. It is a changing blogging world out there, and it seems as if the law is starting to catch up.
Full post as published by The Greatest American Lawyer on November 09, 2009 (boomark / email).
Environment Law
alleging damages from violation of the law.
CVS Mailing
Sparks Allegations of Privacy Violation
Georgette Klinger Spa
alleging unpaid wages and benefits and violation of the WARN Act.
Sprint Nextel
alleging violation of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act
Germantown Primary Care Associates, P.C.
Unlawfully collected fees refunded in Consumer Protection Act violation suit.
Delta and Pine Land Co.
$300,000 settlement in SEC norms violation lawsuit.

FTC's Guides on Endorsements and Testimonials
Judicial Endorsements and Down Ticket Races in North Carolina
FTC Revises Guides Governing Endorsements and Testimonials
Sleep diagnostic clinic accused of FCA violations








