ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> IPKat

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Intellectual Property Law

: IPKat

Entente Cordial as Pitcher's changes shade, label

By Johanna Gibson, David Pearce, Jeremy Phillips and Ilanah Simon.

ADVERTISEMENTS
The IPKat has just read, via Brand Republic, that global drinks giant Diageo and powerful UK supermarket chain Sainsbury's have reached agreement in their dispute over the latter's allegedly 'copycat' product Pitcher's, said to resemble leading brand Pimm's (click here to see the products side by side). According to the breaking story,

"Diageo launched its legal proceedings against Sainsbury's in August over Pitcher's, a gin-based drink to which lemonade and fruit can be added. It's priced lower than the Diageo brand.

Right: a live unexploded Pimm's awaits the attention of the Cordial Disposal Squad

However a joint statement from the two companies today said: ?Diageo and Sainsbury's are pleased to confirm that the dispute regarding Diageo's Pimm's brand and Sainsbury's Pitchers brand has been amicably settled and the legal proceedings withdrawn.'

Sainsbury's will continue sell the Pitchers brand, but with a modified label. It will also change the colouring from gold to orange".

The Press Association adds that the terms of the settlement -- apart, presumably, from those just mentioned -- are confidential.

The notably colourblind IPKat, who cannot easily tell old gold from orange, is amused at the terms of the settlement. He's also feeling smug that, with the benefit of nothing more than his 20/20 hindsight and the assistance of a cluster of international experts, at the MARQUES conference Community Designs Workshop he was able to construct a portfolio of Community designs and Community trade marks that would have enabled Diageo to blast Pitcher's off the market without the need for any settlement (see Class 99 here for further details).

Merpel adds: this looks like a big win for Sainsbury's in the short term, since so many likely consumers have now heard through media reports that Pitcher's is on sale at a lower price but will also have imbibed the notion, rightly or wrongly, that it is either an identical or equivalent product. But Pitcher's will have to lean heavily on the credibility of the Sainsbury's brand in order to persuade prospective consumers to try it (would it have worked if it was seen as a Lidl or Aldi product, she wonders?) The thing for Diageo to do is to set up website that is reminiscent of Sainsbury's, perhaps calling it Salisbury's, through which it can market its Pimm's more effectively ...

Full post as published by IPKat on October 01, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0022 secs (from cache 11/05/26 23:44:22)