ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> International Law Blogs -> Australian Regulatory Compliance Review

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

International Law

: Australian Regulatory Compliance Review

Mutual Recognition of Cross-Border Financial Services Regulation

ADVERTISEMENTS

In an address by Dr Ken Henry, Secretary to the Treasury, to the ASIC Summer School he outlined the Treasury?s perspective on the important policy issues associated with the mutual recognition of securities regulation generally and, specifically, with the United States and New Zealand.

Dr Henry discussed the importance of global finance markets to Australia and Australia?s approach to the regulation of cross border securities regulation.

To date, six overseas markets, including the Chicago Board of Trade and the Chicago Mercantile Exchange have been granted licences to operate in Australia.

In respect of foreign financial service providers, "the Corporations Act also requires a person who carries on a financial services business in Australia to hold an Australian Financial Services Licence ... An exemption may be provided if the foreign financial service provider is regulated by an overseas regulator and the financial services on offer are already prescribed as being suitable for an exemption.

As at May 2007, there were 289 foreign financial service providers, including 132 entities from the United States, with an exemption."

Dr Henry also discussed mutual recognition of Australia ? New Zealand securities offerings:

On 22 February 2006 the Governments of Australia and New Zealand signed a treaty on the Mutual Recognition of Securities Offerings.

This regime is expected to come into effect early this year. It will allow an issuer to extend an offer that is being made lawfully in one of the countries to investors in the other, host, country without having to comply with most of the substantive requirements of the host jurisdiction?s fundraising laws applying to domestic offers.

The practical effect is that the one prospectus may be used in both countries, reducing compliance costs and furthering the integration between the two markets."

Full post as published by Australian Regulatory Compliance Review on February 23, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0158 secs (new cache)