Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Crime & Federalism
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Crime & FederalismIs Dangling a Noose a Threat?
ADVERTISEMENTS
A man in Louisiana has been charged with a hate crime under 18 U.S.C. 245 based on the following conduct:A white man accused of driving past a group of black civil rights
activists with two nooses dangling from the back of his pickup truck
has been indicted on federal hate-crime and conspiracy charges, federal
prosecutors said Jan. 24.The issue, of course, is this: Is dangling a noose a threat of force? KipEsquire doesn't think so: I
think, as a matter of reasonableness (not to mention the First
Amendment), driving past a rally with two nooses on your truck simply
does not rise to the level of using "force or threat of force." More is
needed.
If there had been a more proximate display (e.g., brandishing weapons
or shouting unambiguous threats), then perhaps the incident could rise
to prosecutable "force or threat of force...continue to full postFull post as published by Crime & Federalism on January 29, 2008 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

NY Law Bans Use of Nooses to Intimidate
New Law #1: Professor's files subpoened in "Noose" Case
Golf Week and the Noose: Context Matters
Behold My Split Infinitives, My Dangling Prepositions, and My Singular They







