ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Research Blogs -> New York Supreme Court Criminal Term Library

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal Research

: New York Supreme Court Criminal Term Library

New York Law Journal: Featured Columnists September 15, 2009

By David Badertscher, PLL

ADVERTISEMENTS

If you are already an online subscriber to the New York Law Journal you should be able to click on any of the links provided below, sign in, and access the full text of articles listed.

http://www.nylj.com

Subscription required for online access unless otherwise noted:

Products Liability
Tuesday, September 15, 2009
By Michael Hoenig

" Michael Hoenig, a member of Herz­feld & Rubin, writes that despite a kind of dramatic sound to the words "excited utterance," most folks do not get stirred up by the term. However, for serious litigators the words should trigger sober thoughts about the law of evidence and, specifically, about an important exception to the hearsay exclusionary rule. A recent federal appellate decision shows how an excited utterance scenario can play out in a products liability case with pivotal consequences."

OUTSIDE COUNSEL:

The Lessons of 'Lyon' on Insider Trading Liability
Tuesday, September 15, 2009
By Michael A. Asaro and Robert H. Hotz Jr.

"Michael A. Asaro and Robert H. Hotz Jr., partners at Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, discuss the recent decision in SEC v. Lyon, a case in which the SEC alleged a hedge fund being solicited to invest in a PIPE offering used its inside information about the impending PIPEs by covering its short positions after the deals were announced and the market prices of the issuers' securities declined as a result, and how professional investors involved in overlapping public and private investments in the same issuer might reduce their risk of facing a potentially long and costly investigation or litigation with the SEC."

TECHNOLOGY TODAY:

 Intellectual Property
Tuesday, September 15, 2009
By Stephen M. Kramarsky

" Stephen M. Kramarsky, a member of Dewey Pegno & Kramarsky, writes that the fundamental legal question facing Internet radio providers - as in any business that involves providing access to intellectual property - is licensing. The current copyright law relating to the digital broadcast of sound recordings (which is called 'performance' in copyright law parlance), he says, allows the owners of sound recording copyrights (typically the record companies) to collect royalties under one of two licensing systems: a statutory royalty or a licensing agreement negotiated directly with the copyright holder."

Full post as published by New York Supreme Court Criminal Term Library on September 15, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0136 secs (new cache)