Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Litigation Blogs -> How Appealing

Litigation

: How Appealing

"Justices Are Pressed for Broad Ruling in Campaign Case"

"Justices Are Pressed for Broad Ruling in Campaign Case": Adam Liptak will have this article Thursday in The New York Times.

Robert Barnes of The Washington Post has a news update headlined "Court Conservatives Concerned About Campaign Spending Limits."

David G. Savage of The Los Angeles Times has a news update headlined "Supreme Court weighs lifting ban on corporate funding of candidates; The court, joined by new Justice Sonia Sotomayor, hears a special argument on whether companies should have the same free-speech rights as individuals."

Joan Biskupic of USA Today has a news update headlined "Court hears pre-term case on Clinton film."

Greg Stohr of Bloomberg News reports that "Top Court Questions Corporate Election Spending Curbs."

James Vicini of Reuters reports that "Supreme Court questions company campaign spending limits."

Mark Sherman and Pete Yost of The Associated Press report that "Supreme Court receptive to freer election spending."

At "SCOTUSblog," Lyle Denniston has a post titled "Two precedents in jeopardy."

And at "The BLT: The Blog of Legal Times," Tony Mauro has posts titled "Supreme Court Majority Critical of Campaign Law Precedents" and "Photos from the Supreme Court Plaza."

You can access the transcript of today's U.S. Supreme Court oral argument at this link. And, via C-SPAN, you can access the audio of today's oral argument at this link.

Full post as published by How Appealing on September 09, 2009 (boomark / email).