ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Consumer Law Blogs -> Alabama Consumer Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Consumer Law

: Alabama Consumer Blog

Morgtage Servicers - Story Of Repeated Abuses In Foreclosure Context

By M. Stan Herring

ADVERTISEMENTS

Daniel Wagner of the Huffington Post recently wrote an excellent article about mortgage servicers that harass borrowers. You should read this interesting post by Daniel.

Here's part of the problem:

Without government aid, servicers don't have enough financial incentive to modify mortgages. Each year, they earn about one-quarter to one-half percent of the value of the loans they service, so the larger the mortgage, the more they make. They earn less if the loan is modified, usually by lowering the interest rate or principal or adjusting the term.

The servicers also make money through late fees, or by foreclosing. The paperwork necessary to execute a foreclosure can generate hundreds of dollars in fees for some servicers.

Here is a situation that we are seeing more of in Alabama:

As borrowers fell behind on their loans, the servicers pocketed more late fees, foreclosure fees and negotiation fees. Some even profited from foreclosures.

In February 2005, Janet Simmons was more than $30,000 behind on her mortgage. Bayview Loan Servicing began foreclosure proceedings on her home, located on 3.1 acres in rural Rockingham County, Va., between Washington and Charlottesville.

But Bayview ? which stands to receive up to $44.3 million from Treasury's loan-modification program ? foreclosed without providing required written notice, the Virginia State Supreme Court found. Bayview never sent Simmons a letter by certified mail, as required under her loan.

Unbeknownst to Simmons, the home was sold at auction in July 2005. She didn't find out she had lost the house until the new buyer asked why she was doing yard work on a home she no longer owned, said her lawyer, Kevin Rose.

The courts awarded Simmons $156,809 ? the difference between what her home was worth and what it had received in a foreclosure sale.

The contract between the borrower and the mortgage company - the note/mortgage - must be followed. If it is not followed then the mortgage company has breached the contract. One provision often violated, and in fact we are suing a company for this tomorrow, is the requirement to give proper notice to the consumer that the note is being accelerated and declared in default.

Due to the increasing amount of fraud and illegal conduct in this area, we are going to hold a free foreclosure seminar in early October to help Alabama consumers understand their rights in dealing with mortgage companies and servicers. Feel free to contact us if you would like to attend. We will have more details and our new website devoted solely to foreclosure issues in the next week or so.

Full post as published by Alabama Consumer Blog on September 07, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0126 secs (new cache)