Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Kentucky Blogs -> Kentucky Cases
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Kentucky
: Kentucky CasesBusiness law (horse-breeding contract); KRE 406 habit or routine evidence: Curry v. Bennett (COA 4/24/2009)
By Michael Stevens
2007-CA-002315
04/24/2009
2009 WL 1097959
Opinion by Judge Wine; Judges Dixon and Keller concurred.
The Court affirmed a judgment of the circuit court ordering appellant to specifically perform on a horse-breeding contract and awarding appellee damages for appellant?s breach of the contract. The Court first held that the trial court did not err by allowing evidence of customary practices in the American Saddlebred horse industry that a trainer acts as the agent for the horse owner. KRE 406 allows for evidence of habit or routine practice of an organization to prove the conduct of a person on a particular occasion was in conformity with the practice. The testimony at issue was relevant and admissible to show that appellee reasonably relied upon appellant?s trainer?s apparent authority to negotiate the agreement.
The Court next held that the trial court properly instructed the jury on the issue of agency and did not improperly shift the burden to appellant to prove that the trainer was not acting as his agent. First, the instruction substantially adopted the recommended instruction set out in prior caselaw. Moreover, since appellant admitted that he knew the trainer was negotiating with appellee, the only issue was whether appellee knew that the trainer lacked authority to negotiate.
The Court finally held that in order to show the diminished value of the colt, the trial court properly allowed testimony that had appellant not failed to provide the necessary paperwork for the colt, the colt would likely have won a weanling competition. The evidence was not unduly speculative in light of all of the evidence presented to establish the colt?s diminished value. Further, appellant had the opportunity to cross-examine all of the evidence.
Full post as published by Kentucky Cases on September 07, 2009 (boomark / email).
Uniform Commercial Code and Contracts
Interstate commercial transactions and sale of goods in the United States
Employment Contracts
General Contract Law Principles
Consulting Contract
Racine Unified School District agrees to pay Public Business Consulting Group a $750,000 settlement.
Icy Fall
Super Eight Motel pays Horse veterinarian $2 million personal injury settlement.
AnchorBank
$1.27 million in construction contract termination lawsuit.
Ram Publishing
alleging phone book advertising contract fraud.
Express Scripts Inc.
Over $9.5 million payout in deceptive business practices lawsuit.
FedEx
Ground Business Model Wins Class Action in Washington

Employment Law for Business: New Edition
Curry v. State, No. 3D09-14 (Fla. App. 4/15/2009) (Fla. App., 2009)
Are my informal e-mails legaly binding contracts
Drawloop-Automation of Routine Sales Contracts








