ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Academic Blogs -> Conglomerate

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Academic

: Conglomerate

Rational Choice or Behavioral Law and Economics?

By Gordon Smith, Christine, Hurt, Vic Fleischer, Fred Tung, Lisa Fairfax, David Zaring

ADVERTISEMENTS

While there are behavioral biases in entrepreneurial finance ? e.g., entrepreneurs are overconfident and VCs fall prey to the availability heuristic ? they don?t seem as prevalent as in public securities markets, or at least don?t lend themselves to the same calls for regulatory reform. Still, with recent notable works like Nudge and thought-provoking posts like this one from Josh Wright (on Jones v. Harris), it?s hard not to spend some time figuring out into which camp ? rational choice or behavioral law and economics ? you more firmly plant your flag.

The behavioral camp has much to offer. But several observations made by others persuade me not to dip my toes too deep into the behavioral waters. Here?s a quick list:

--Regulatory responses are challenging because different individuals have different biases, and even the same individual may have competing biases that negate each other;

--While individuals have biases, so do regulators (see Choi & Pritchard comparing the biases of investors with those at the SEC);

--The rational choice model works pretty well most of the time (and critics sometimes seem to forget that it?s only meant as a model, not a full-on reflection of the real world); and

--Taking into account behavioral biases in policy prescriptions removes incentives for correction. Tom Ulen has a nice discussion of this in a short article at 10 Lewis & Clark L. Rev. 177, 179-80 (2006) (it doesn?t appear to be on SSRN). There he differentiates between our ?software? biases that can be corrected, including the entertaining Monty Hall three-door problem, and our ?hardware? biases that are much harder to correct. Regulatory responses seem more appropriate for hardware biases, education for software biases.

There are also persuasive critiques of the rational choice model, and they get a lot of play these days. But regulatory responses based on the behavioral model are far from easy or perfect, and rational choice has proved highly instructive in my work on sophisticated entrepreneurial parties. I for one am not ready to toss it out just yet.

Full post as published by Conglomerate on September 04, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0183 secs (new cache)