ADVERTISEMENT



Google       
Call (866) 635-2689 for a free Personal Injury evaluation by attorney in your area.

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Personal Injury Law Blogs -> Legal Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Personal Injury Law

: Legal Blog

Suffolk County Nation?s First County to Ban Electronic Cigarettes from Minors and From Public Indoor Spaces

ADVERTISEMENTS

On August 18, 2009, the Sullolk County Legislature voted to ban electronic cigarettes from public indoor spaces where ‘traditional forms of smoking are already disallowed,’ but allows adults to use the devices anywhere cigarette smoking is permitted. The bill also bans the sale of e-cigarettes to anyone under the age of 19. The bill has been described as the first of its kind in the nation. It cites the ‘unknown’ amount of nicotine in the battery-operated devices as presenting a ’significant risk of rapid addiction or overdose.’ Suffolk’s new law is expected to take effect 90 days after the New York Secretary of State signs the bill in Albany.

Electronic cigarettes, also called ?e-cigarettes,? are battery-operated devices that generally contain cartridges filled with nicotine, flavor and other chemicals. The electronic cigarette turns nicotine, which is highly addictive, and other chemicals into a vapor that is inhaled by the user. They deliver nicotine without burning tobacco like conventional cigarettes. Electronic cigarettes are designed to mimic the look and experience of smoking a conventional cigarette, down to their battery-powered glowing red tip.

Manufacturers of e-cigarettes are trying to avoid coming under the regulatory powers of the FDA by asserting that e-cigarettes should be considered as a tobacco product, as opposed to a drug. Manufacturer Smoking Everywhere did not seek FDA pre-approval under the theory that a regulatory loophole allowed the sale of the devices as long as they were not marketed for smoking cessation, such as Chantix.

E-cigarettes have become quite controversial. The federal Food and Drug Administration (?FDA?) has confiscated shipments from overseas of e-cigarettes. The FDA is trying to regulate their use under the recently passed Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act, which brought cigarettes within FDA’s regulatory reach. An FDA report said that they contain carcinogens (of course, its still tobacco-based). The agency also reported that of 18 cartridges tested, one contained diethylene glycol, an ingredient in antifreeze.

Many are concerned that e-cigarettes are being marketed to children. In Oregon, the State?s Attorney General is suing Florida-based e-cigarette company Smoking Everywhere, alleging that the made false health claims about its device and targeted children with sweet flavors such as bubblegum, chocolate and cookies ‘n’ cream. Advertisements use young female models who look like teenagers. Further, as part of its advertising campaign, Smoking Everywhere staged a promotional event on the Howard Stern radio show that told listeners: “For kids out there, you still look cool ’cause, like, it still looks like a cigarette…”

E-cigarettes are readily available online and in shopping malls. In addition, they do not contain any health warnings comparable to FDA-approved nicotine replacement products or conventional cigarettes.

Defenders of e-cigarettes counter by pointing out that the levels of tobacco-specific nitrosamines (the carcinogens) detected in electronic cigarettes were below the level allowed in nicotine replacement products, such as nicotine patches, inhalers and gum.

The level of the same tobacco-specific nitrosamines in conventional cigarettes is at least 300 to 1,400 times higher than what has been detected in electronic cigarette cartridges.

They say that e-cigarettes cannot be regulated as drug devices because the companies did not claim their product improved users’ health, or affected the body any differently than smoking a normal cigarette.

Full post as published by Legal Blog on August 31, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.004 secs (from cache 10/31/26 06:29:10)