Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Southern California Criminal Defense Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Southern California Criminal Defense BlogSupreme Court Rules DNA Tests for Prisoners Not a Constitutional Right
By Walin & Klarich
Full post as published by Southern California Criminal Defense Blog on August 30, 2009 (boomark / email).
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Unwed Fathers' Rights in Adoption
Landmark Cases in Adoption Law Shape Law with respect to Unwed Fathers
Discouraging Union Organizers
Strict work place rules
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
VA Sets New Benefit Rules for Agent Orange-Related Ilnesses
Agent Orange-Related Ilnesses VA Sets New Benefit Rules
Cancer Testing
Dianon Systems Inc. pays $1.5 million whistleblower settlement after billing for medically unnecessary tests.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement
alleging government agencies and officials violated immigrant workers' constitutional rights.
Right-of-Way
City of Hastings pays preacher $1 settlement and $10,000 in legal fees for constitutional right violations.
Cowboy Hat
Lincoln County pays citizen $10,500 settlement for Constitutional Rights violations.
Ebay Fined
French Court Sets Fine at $61 Million

U.S. Supreme Rules No Constitutional Right to DNA test
Inmates don't have a right to DNA tests long after they've been convicted, Supreme Court rules
U.S. Supreme Court Justices To Hear Case On Convicts Rights To DNA Tests
More News Coverage of the Osborne Ruling
"Supreme Court: Prisoners Have No Right to DNA Evidence."









