ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> International Law Blogs -> Misleading Advertising Law

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

International Law

: Misleading Advertising Law

Lawyers Guilty in Ponzi Scheme

ADVERTISEMENTS

The Daily Report is reporting that Bilked investor balks at [law] firm's deal in the Mobile Billboards of America.

"Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker has asked an Atlanta federal judge to approve a settlement of a case alleging that some of the firm's Los Angeles lawyers helped clients sell investments in roving billboards that they should have realized was a scam.

The settlement filed with the court is still under seal, but a letter from an investor to U.S. District Judge Charles A. Pannell Jr. of the Northern District of Georgia hints it may top $4 million.

The investor complained that it's a poor deal for those who lost money, especially when Troutman Sanders lawyers who brought the suit on behalf of the billboard companies' court-appointed receiver would get one-third as their fee."


So how much are the investors going to get out of this settlement?

"Although the investors are no longer plaintiffs and the case was never certified as a class action, the investor's letter indicates that investors can expect to receive money under the deal—apparently through the receiver.

The letter says that under the proposal “we receive ten cents on a dollar.

The letter doesn't give a dollar figure, but the complaint against the law firm says that the purchases of the billboard investments exceed $60 million and that the Mobile Billboards entities are obligated to repurchase billboard investments and make refunds in excess of $40 million to investors who purchased the billboards after the entities engaged Paul Hastings.

A deal of 10 percent suggests that Paul Hastings -which has announced that in 2007 it grossed $976 million, with equity partners taking home on average $1.92 million each-would pay at least $4 million."

This was the securities version of a business opportunities fraud. It was actually very simple to diagnosis as a fraud - for any experienced attorney.

Here is what the investors should be asking themselves: why didn't they form a group, prior to investing, and getting good due diligence advice?

Related Posts:

SEC Charges Mobile Billboards Salesmen


Why Some People Always Get Scammed.

Full post as published by Misleading Advertising Law on February 21, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0126 secs (new cache)