Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> IP Law Observer
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Intellectual Property Law
: IP Law ObserverInjunction After Trade Secret Case Was Too Broad In Prohibiting Customer Solicitation
The One Sentence Summary: A preliminary injunction against former employees in a trade secret case was too broad and in violation of California's prohibition on non-compete agreements (Business & Professions Code § 16600) in barring former employees from soliciting customers of the former employer whose identities were not trade secrets.
Full post as published by IP Law Observer on August 20, 2009 (boomark / email).
Trade Secrets
Former execs are hit with doctrine of inevitable disclosure.
Victoria's Secret
Bras may have caused Woman's Itching, Rash and Welts
Gaylord Gas
allegedly overcharged customer for propane.
Sears
Class Action over Alleged Selling of Customer Information
Trade Secrets
Razorsight agreed to pay $4.5 million settlement in infringement lawsuit.
Newspaper Publisher
Star Tribune must pay St. Paul Pioneer Press a $3.8 million trade secrets act violations settlement.
Gleevec
Possible Case of Kidney Damage Reported

Dont Play Mind Games With Trade Secrets
Non-solicitation provisions must bear relation to employees' activities
04/24/07 Trade Secret Law: Lydall
Seventh Circuit: Injunction against use of plaintiff's copyrights and trade secrets too vague
050707 Trade Secret Law: AFM Insurance
Preliminary Injunction Denied in Trade Secret Case After TRO Granted








