ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Copyright Law Blogs -> Recording Industry vs The People

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Copyright Law

: Recording Industry vs The People

Audrey Amurao files reply brief in support of her cross-motion for summary judgment

By Ty Rogers and Ray Beckerman

ADVERTISEMENTS

In Lava Records v. Amurao II, the defendant has filed her reply brief in support of her cross-motion for summary judgment.

Defendant's reply memorandum in support of defendant's cross-motion for summary judgment


Keywords: lawyer digital copyright law online internet law legal download upload peer to peer p2p file sharing filesharing music movies indie independent label freeculture creative commons pop/rock artists riaa independent mp3 cd favorite songs intellectual property portable music player

Full post as published by Recording Industry vs The People on August 19, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Child Support Survival Guide
The Child Support Enforcement System

Child Support Overview
Federal requires states to set guidelines for support.

Child Support Orders
How to modify terms

Child Support
Disputing Paternity

Missing Children
Databases and organizations

Lawsuits and Settlements

Lehman Brothers
Bankrupt, Files Chapter 11

Nevada Onion
Workers Injured, EPA Files Complaint

Sperm Donor
Ordered to Pay Child Support

West Virginia Child Advocate Office Faces Class Action over Child Support
West Virginia Child Advocate Office Faces Class Action over Child Support

Family Law
involving divorce, child custody, spousal support, common law, adoption and same sex marriage.

Anthem Blue Cross
Settles with California

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!


Motion For Summary Judgment Must Be Based On Evidence, Not Mere Averments

When the plaintiff and the defendant in a civil suit file cross-motions for summary judgment, and a federal district court grants the defendant's motion and denies the plaintiff's, what happens if the plaintiff appeals only from the denial of her motion

CIVIL PROCEDURE: Pro se plaintiff sufficiently rebutted properly supported summary judgment motion in malicious prosecution claim by submitting a notarized response which constituted an affidavit: HUNT V. LAWSON (SC 10/23/2008)

Pilkington v. Cardinal Health, Inc. (9th Cir. - Feb. 19, 2008)

NEW MEDIA STRATEGIES, INC., Appellant/Cross-Appellee v. PULPFREE, INC. d/b/a BuzzMetrics, et al., Appellees/Cross-Appellants.

Novell Files for Partial Summary Judgment - on 4th Claim Re SCOsource









0.0033 secs (from cache 11/03/26 09:18:33)