Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Academic Blogs -> Food Law Prof Blog
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Academic
: Food Law Prof BlogThird Circuit Holds Snapple Suit Not Preempted: Stacy Holk v. Snapple Beverage Corp.
ADVERTISEMENTS
The Third Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that a consumer action against the makers of Snapple is not preempted by the Food Drug and Cosmetic Act. The case is Stacy Holk v. Snapple Beverage Corp, 08-3060, 3rd U.S. Circuit...Full post as published by Food Law Prof Blog on August 14, 2009 (boomark / email).
Related Law Articles
Mesothelioma Law Suit
Asbestos Exposure
He Had it Coming
Stacy Schneider's Ten-step Plan for Outsmarting your Husband and Winning a Divorce
Stacy Schneider
Stacy Schneider offers to be Britney Spears Lawyer for Free
Lawsuits and Settlements
Specialty Lamp International
Recalls Counterfeit Circuit Breakers
Rite Aid Corp. and Eckerd Corp.
allegedly failed to pay overtime to assistant store managers.
Waters Corp
WAT
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

"Dr Pepper Snapple Group Must Face Suit Over 'All Natural' Label"
HFCS Labeling Case: Opening The Floodgates For New Consumer Claims
Third Circuit Rejects FDA Preemption for Snapple Consumer Fraud Suit
New Jersey Law Journal: News Briefs August 14, 2009








