Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal News Blogs -> Legal Pad | LA
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal News
: Legal Pad | LAProp 8 suit still has supporters on different pages
By Richard Binder
The Recorder reported a couple weeks back about the clash between attorneys and civil rights groups in the federal challenge of Proposition 8. That clash seems to continue to heat up.
Now that a trial is nearing, the lawyers who denounced the suit want to join as full participants, asking for seats at the table and the ability to shape legal strategy. But the consultant who defied their advice has vowed to "vigorously oppose" their intervention, and, in a court filing late Friday, lawyers formally opposed intervention.
The American Civil Liberties Union, Lambda Legal and the National Center for Lesbian Rights initially called the challenge to California's same-sex marriage ban risky and rash, and warned that an adverse ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court could set the movement back decades. The groups now say they want to bring more members of the gay community into the case, which their detractors say would cost time.
A federal judge in San Francisco will decide the lineup of lawyers later this month.
Full post as published by Legal Pad | LA on August 10, 2009 (boomark / email).
Mesothelioma Law Suit
Asbestos Exposure
Yellow Pages
Directory Billing agrees $400,000 deceptive marketing settlement.
Potential Class Action Suit
For Underpayment of Truck Drivers
Ticketmaster Class Action
Canada-wide suit launched
Kahala Hotel?|
Faces Suit over Service Fees
Drycleaners
Launch $5 Million Class Action Suit Against Infinite Energy
DHL Overcharges
Class Action Suit Launched

An Interesting Sell on Prop. 11
Does Prop 8 campaign finance disclosure suit have legs
Challenging Prop. 8 in the Federal Courts: A Bold Gambit
Prop. 8 Ruling a Blow to All Minorities
Fed. Prop. 8 case all systems go
Calif. amend. suit claims prejudicial ballot








